I THINK THIS MEANS THAT THE WHISTLE BLOWERS GOT SCARED SHIT..ABOUT ENDING UP IN SOME BODY BAGS...wink...wink.

I THINK THIS MEANS THAT THE WHISTLE BLOWERS GOT SCARED SHIT..ABOUT ENDING UP IN SOME BODY BAGS...wink...wink..!! ESPECIALLY AFTER THE FBI RAID WHOSE APPARENT PURPOSE WAS TO SHUT THEM UP BY REMOVING THEIR EVIDENCE

IF THE WHISTLE-BLOWERS WERE CLEVER ENOUGH TO PRESERVE THEIR EVIDENCE IN LOCATIONS OUTSIDE THEIR HOME THEN THE SUBSEQUENT DEALING WITH THE CORRUPT FBI AND THE EVIL CLINTONS WOULD HAVE PRODUCED THESE TYPES OF RESULTS

BASED ON THE FACT THAT THE FBI RAID WAS SUSPECT AND UNWARRANTED DUE TO THE WHISTLE BLOWING STATUS OF THE PEOPLE THEY RAIDED, I AM GUESSING THAT, IF THESE WHISTLE BLOWERS DID PROTECT THEIR EVIDENCE BY HIDING THEM IN LOCATIONS OUTSIDE THEIR HOME, THE SUBSEQUENT DEALING WOULD MOST LIKELY HAVE BEEN IN THE FORM OF:

THE WHISTLE BLOWERS SAYING SOMETHING LIKE ..."HEHEHEH YOU DID NOT FIND THE EVIDENCE TO DESTROY IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE CLINTONS BUT WE STILL HAVE THEM AND WE WILL SUE YOUR ASS FOR THE COVER UP ATTEMPT" AND THEN THE FBI ALONG WITH THE CLINTONS RESPONDING BY BRIBING THEIR SILENCE

NOTHING ELSE FITS THE WHISTLE BLOWERS' ODD AND SUDDEN REFUSAL TO PROVIDE THE ANTI CLINTON EVIDENCE THAT WOULD CREDIT THEIR WHISTLE BLOWING CLAIMS

IF THE CLINTONS REFUSE TO SUE THE WHISTLE BLOWERS FOR THEIR APPARENT DEFAMATORY CLAIMS, BECAUSE THAT'S IS WHAT THEIR CLAIMS WOULD BE WITHOUT EVIDENCE, THEN THE NOTED BRIBERY CAN BE SAFELY SUSPECTED AS A FACT

YOUR THOUGHTS...?


Clinton Foundation whistleblowers refuse to hand over crucial documents

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:15 AM PT — Friday, Dec. 14, 2018

House Oversight Committee Chairman Mark Meadows is slamming two Clinton Foundation whistleblowers for refusing to share crucial documents with lawmakers. READ MORE

https://www.oann.com/clinton-foundation-whistleblowers-refuse-to-hand-over-crucial-documents/


https://www.oann.com/clinton-foundation-whistleblowers-refuse-to-hand-over-crucial-documents/